Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

or register an account

Find any software, resource, person, article etc.

Sections

Results 2008

Results of the spike time prediction challenge 2008
The results have also been published in Biological Cybernetics 
 

Challenge A


 Results 2008 - A
 
In the above table we see the ranking of participants along with their average performance (middle column) and bootstrap estimation of standard deviation (right column).  There were 3 statistically equivalent solutions:
 
 - Shinomoto & Kobayashi (Autoregressive exogenous model with moving threshold),
 - Badel (Exponential integrate-and-fire with dynamic threshold),
 - Mensi (spike response model with moving threshold)).
 
 
The winner submission is decided according to the best average performance:
 
    2nd prize : Shigeru Shinomoto.
  
    You can download the ‘answers’ of the test set here: V.txt
 
 

Challenge B

 
        Split 2nd prize: Tie between Kramer (hand tuned Traub model), Hirschi and Naud (adaptive Exponential Integrate-and-Fire), Acker (Izhikevich’s simple model) and Druckmann (Hodgkin and Huxley type model tuned with genetic algorithm).  
 
This challenge was difficult to win since the winning solution had to achieve the best cost for each feature of the test set.  To display the results we have kept the best submission of each participant.  We can make a global ranking using the criteria of last year’s challenge (http://icwww.epfl.ch/~gerstner//QuantNeuronMod2007/). Briefly, we take C to be the sum over i of ci*(0.5)i with ci being the cost associated with each feature in decreasing order of cost (c1 is the cost of the worse feature, c2 the second worse, etc.).  With this ranking scheme, the results are:
 
1. C = 9.5      Hirschi - Naud (adaptive Exponential Integrate and Fire)
2. C = 11      Druckmann (Hodgkin-Huxley type model)
3. C =  38     Acker (Izhikevich’s simple model)
4. C = 112    Kramer (Traub model)
 
You can download the test set ‘answers’ here: ChallBTestV.txt.
 

Challenge C:

 
1. Ryota Kobayashi              C1 = 0.499    C2 = 0.427
 
2. Shigeru Shinomoto                  C1 = 0.476       C2 = 0.379
 
3. Richard Naud                  C1 = 0.309    C2 = 0.168
 
 

Challenge D:

 
1. Richard Naud            D1 = 0.408    D2 = 0.446
 
 
Ryota Kobayashi wins Challenge C, Richard Naud wins Challenge D.